|
|
Community and Economic Development – Blog by UNC School of Government https://ced.sog.unc.edu Reining in Business Incentives?By Jonathan MorganPublished June 3, 2014
A short piece by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) adds to a growing number of calls for state and local governments to significantly limit their use of business incentives for economic development such as tax breaks, cash grants, and the like. The CFR “Policy Innovation Memo” is titled Curtailing the Subsidy War Within the United States and it envisions a future in which business incentives are used sparingly within a framework of high transparency, greater disclosure, and increased monitoring and accountability. The memo outlines the need for enforceable rules that would govern the use of incentives and looks to international models for inspiration and guidance. The recommendations include: 1) requiring state and local governments to report incentives to a “federal data warehouse”; 2) state mandated cost-benefit analyses for all incentive deals above a certain amount; 3) creating regional compacts to discourage counterproductive incentive competition; and 4) stricter incentive/subsidy rules within the World Trade Organization (WTO) with greater U.S. compliance. Sensible reforms or wishful thinking? What do you think?
|
Published June 3, 2014 By Jonathan Morgan
A short piece by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) adds to a growing number of calls for state and local governments to significantly limit their use of business incentives for economic development such as tax breaks, cash grants, and the like. The CFR “Policy Innovation Memo” is titled Curtailing the Subsidy War Within the United States and it envisions a future in which business incentives are used sparingly within a framework of high transparency, greater disclosure, and increased monitoring and accountability. The memo outlines the need for enforceable rules that would govern the use of incentives and looks to international models for inspiration and guidance. The recommendations include: 1) requiring state and local governments to report incentives to a “federal data warehouse”; 2) state mandated cost-benefit analyses for all incentive deals above a certain amount; 3) creating regional compacts to discourage counterproductive incentive competition; and 4) stricter incentive/subsidy rules within the World Trade Organization (WTO) with greater U.S. compliance.
Sensible reforms or wishful thinking? What do you think?
Author(s)
Tagged Under
This blog post is published and posted online by the School of Government to address issues of interest to government officials. This blog post is for educational and informational Copyright ©️ 2009 to present School of Government at the University of North Carolina. All rights reserved. use and may be used for those purposes without permission by providing acknowledgment of its source. Use of this blog post for commercial purposes is prohibited. To browse a complete catalog of School of Government publications, please visit the School’s website at www.sog.unc.edu or contact the Bookstore, School of Government, CB# 3330 Knapp-Sanders Building, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330; e-mail sales@sog.unc.edu; telephone 919.966.4119; or fax 919.962.2707.